SFUSD Mathematics
  • Home
  • SFUSD Math
    • Contact
    • Our Vision >
      • Guiding Principles for School Mathematics
    • Secondary Course Sequence >
      • High School Pathways
      • Math Validation Test
      • Summer School Geometry
    • Conference & Community Presentations
    • In the News
    • FAQ >
      • Secondary Math FAQ
  • Curriculum
    • CCSS-M: The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics >
      • Standards for Math Practice
      • Overlapping Standards - Math, Science and ELA
    • The SFUSD Math Core Curriculum >
      • Using the Units
      • What does it mean to use the core curriculum?
      • History of the SFUSD Curriculum
      • Curriculum Development Teams
    • Accessing Core Curriculum Unit Plans >
      • Google Classroom
      • About the SFUSD Elementary Math Core Curriculum
    • Assessment
    • Feedback
    • Multilingual Glossary >
      • Multilingual Standards for Math Practice and Math Norms
  • TOOLKIT
    • Teaching Strategies >
      • Signature Strategies >
        • Math Talks >
          • Math Talks Resources
          • Sample Math Talks
        • Participation Quiz / Groupwork Feedback
        • 3-Read Protocol >
          • 3-Read Protocol for Kindergarten
      • Class Norms
      • Collaborative Group Work >
        • Group Roles
        • 3 Act Tasks
        • Group Work Success
        • Multiple Abilities Strategy
      • Math is For Everyone >
        • Teaching With Rich Math Tasks
        • Productive Struggle
        • Response to Intervention in Mathematics
        • Universal Design for Learning
        • Growth Mindset
      • Strategy Videos
    • Classroom Engagement >
      • 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Math Discussions >
        • Teaching Through Problem-Solving >
          • Using SFUSD Core Curriculum with TTP
      • Promoting Classroom Discourse >
        • Effective Questioning
        • Student Vital Actions
      • Formative Assessment >
        • Reengagement
        • Formative Assessment Lessons
        • Rubrics
      • Classroom Tools >
        • Manipulatives >
          • Manipulatives List
        • Centers
        • Math Notebooks
        • Rule of Four
        • Gallery Walk
        • Schedules
    • Math Content Support >
      • Partitive and Quotitive Division
      • Estimation
      • Fluency
      • Visual Model Progressions
      • Math Concept Videos
    • Professional Learning >
      • Beginning of Year Launch K-5
      • Collaborative Planning
  • Students
  • Educators
    • Complex Instruction
    • Site Based Support
    • Early Education
    • Resources >
      • Articles of Interest
      • Helpful Videos
      • Blogs and Other Resources
  • Families + Community
    • Resources for Families and Community >
      • Websites for Families and the Community
      • Family Letters
      • SF Loves Learning
    • Recursos Para Familias y la Comunidad

5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Mathematics Discussions

Based on the book by Margaret Smith and Mary Kay Stein

Picture
Facilitating productive discussions about mathematics is very challenging for any teacher. Some lessons can end effectively with a “share and summarize.” At other times, though, a more purposeful discussion is needed to bring out the key mathematics of a lesson.

A key component of productive discussion is teacher facilitation. This facilitation is not accidental and cannot, generally, happen on the fly.

Here are 5 concrete steps that can help improve the quality of mathematics discussion in your class.

1. Anticipating likely student responses to mathematical tasks. 
Involves envisioning potential student responses, strategies (correct or incorrect), representations, procedures, and interpretations.

2. Monitoring students’ actual responses to the tasks. 
Involves paying close attention to students’ mathematical thinking as they work on a problem. Commonly done by circulating around the classroom during group work.

3. Selecting student response to feature during the discussions.
Involves choosing particular students to present their work because of the mathematical responses. These responses need not be chosen solely because they are correct, but rather because they emphasize different approaches to the problem. In fact, it may be advantageous to choose incorrect responses to highlight how and why they are incorrect. This choice can highlight a variety of responses or strategies for a task, or it can show a progression from simple to complex representation. Make sure over time that all students feel they are authors of mathematical ideas.

4. Sequencing student responses during the discussions.
Involves purposeful ordering of the featured student responses in order to make the mathematics accessible to all students. This also helps build a mathematically coherent story line during whole class discussion.

5. Connecting student responses during the discussions.
Involves encouraging students to make mathematical connections between different student responses. This helps ensure that key mathematical ideas remain the focus of the lesson debrief.

The 5 Practices for Orchestrating Mathematical Discourse were adapted from the Japanese model of Teaching Through Problem-Solving.

Picture
SFUSD 
Website
Picture
​SFUSD Technology
Picture
SFUSD 
Science
Picture
SFUSD Multilingual Pathways
Picture
SFUSD
Special
Education
Picture
SFUSD
Achievement
Assessment
Office